In article <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] says...
> In article <[log in to unmask]>,
> [log in to unmask] says...
> <snip>
> > 3. COBOL performs data conversion when moving from one type of field
> > to another (e.g. display to comp, display alphanumeric to display
> > numeric, comp to comp-3, etc.). Use the same datatypes where possible
> > to avoid unwanted conversions.
>
> I'm trying to understand the customers code. They move a PIC X(8) into a
> binary variable (well a COMP type which I thought was binary). How does
> COBOL know that the PIC X(8) contains a binary value rather than an ASCII
> string like "200"?
>
> The reason this doesn't work on ACU COBOL is that ACU tries to interpret
> @4<0><0> as an ASCII string. So this code will work on MPE but not on
> ACU COBOL with an emulation of HPEXTIN.
It's OK - I see the problem now. There's no point in that DISPLAY of the
real number - it's going to print rubish. I should just pass it to PAUSE
and not worry about it.
I think I'm OK now!
Thanks.
--
http://www.beluga.freeserve.co.uk
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *