Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:36:18 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ahhh, I give! I was incorrect about the 'reply' versus
'reply to all' buttons (for this list :). Sometimes when
the fingers go on auto-pilot they decide to play tricks
on the rest of the body and purposely type something
the subconscious knows is wrong (but the conscious refuses
to accept!) It's not the mailer that is broken, it
was the USER!!!
Sheepishly,
Michael
--
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> Behalf Of Steve Dirickson
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 4:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] HP3000-L Help
>
>
> > For THIS list, if you choose to 'reply', then it does in fact
> > go back to the listserver and out to all of the list members.
>
> Only if your mail reader is broken, i.e. non-compliant with
> RFC822. hp3000-l
> is not configured to put itself into the "Reply-To" field of
> the header, so
> the list's address only appears in the "Sender" field; RFC822
> prohibits
> reader software from automatically using the "Sender" value
> as the target of
> a reply.
>
>
> Steve Dirickson WestWin Consulting
> [log in to unmask] (360) 598-6111
>
|
|
|