still waiting for you to give us the solution to Iran and North Korea.

I never am for war, show me where I think war is a good and positive 
thing that should be done for no reason.

I guess you missed the news about the former Iraqi air force general 
that said he personally saw a bunch of WMD being moved to Syria in 
commercial airlines that the seats had been removed, and that Iraq 
had and used WMD multiple times.  I don't see how you keep missing 
that, or understanding that when one party breaks the terms of a 
cease fire with warnings for 10 years, that the terms of the cease 
fire cease and hostilities resume.

At 08:33 AM 1/30/2006, Wirt Atmar wrote:
>Jay writes:
>
> > The leftists who keep carping this way always omit that the "child" is an
> >  adult who has volunteered to be int he military, and quite often has
> >  volunteered to be in Iraq.
>
>A 19 year-old kid is an "adult" only in the sense that he is now capable of
>biological reproduction, but otherwise not in any substantive sense. 
>He's still
>a child, and still very easily psychologically swayed. The military fully
>recognizes this with its designation of "infantry", which literally 
>means "the
>children."
>
>But I consider you, Shawn and Denys old enough to make a fully informed
>decision. Why are none of you in Iraq defending your beliefs? 
>Indeed, why have none
>of you ever served a day either in the military or in a lab building weapons?
>
>
> >  I know of no conservative who considers war entertaining. I'd be perfectly
> >  happy if there was no such thing as war. Unfortunately, that's simply not
> >  possible.
>
>That is of course nonsense. You, Shawn and Denys rooted for this war,
>exaggerating every deception that came from the current 
>administration, and you were
>unethical, immoral fools to do so. This was an elective, illegal 
>war, and I've
>written a dozen times that in a more just world that Bush, Cheney, Rice,
>Rumsfeld, Feith, Perle, Powell and others would be put on trial as 
>war criminals.
>
>And as you well remember, I wrote long before the invasion of Iraq that it
>was obvious that Iraq under Saddam represented no threat to either the United
>States or the region. He was now an old man, possessing an army 1/3rd its
>original size, that it was obvious that he had no weapons of mass 
>destruction, and
>that the situation would resolve itself of its own accord in ten 
>years. No war
>was necessary or even desired.
>
>You like to banter about the term "leftists," but the "rightists" weren't
>right about Iraq -- or much of anything of late. Rather they've simply been
>fools. Highly demonstratable fools.
>
>Wirt Atmar
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *


Regards,

Shawn Gordon
President
theKompany.com
www.thekompany.com
www.mindawn.com
949-713-3276

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *