According to Isaac Blake:
>
> What I did want to bring forward is the problem with NS/VT relative to the
> client.  Many of our users had noticed performance problems using NS/VT over
> their old DTC connections.  In testing we found a 19.2K DTC connection out
> performed the NS/VT almost every time from a PC.
>
> HOWEVER, AND THIS IS IMPORTANT, accessing the same 3000 on the same subnet using
> vt3k on the our workstations the NS/VT performance was equal or slightly better
> than the DTC performance.
>
> So remember in your research to take this into consideration...
>
That is interesting, we have found with 486 PCs that NS/VT outperforms
a DTC  everytime for DOS based terminal emulators like Advancelink
or ms92. We have been moving to WFWG 3.11 and win92 (using Microsoft's
tcp-ip-32), we still get good performance, but it isn't nearly as
fast as it was using Dos, with windows is it more like the DTCs.
 
We have DTC/48 and one lanic all on the same network (until
just last week when we broke up the network into separate nets with
bridging - the performance info comes from before the breakup - it
is too soon to know how the separate nets compare).
 
Has anyone tried 38.4 on the new DTCs?
 
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125