HP3000-L Archives

December 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"HOFMEISTER,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HOFMEISTER,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
Date:
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 21:10:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hello Kenneth,

Re: RE: Advanced TELNET pulled from patches (was "DTC-less")

I do not have a current time frame for Resolution.  I understand
this is a problem Jeff Bandle turned up in Lab testing of the
Telnet/iX product.

I will update the 3000-l when we add this functionality back into
a 6.0 and 6.5 patch.

Regards,

James Hofmeister
Hewlett Packard
Worldwide Technology Network Expert Center
P.S. My Ideals are my own, not necessarily my employers.




After I said:

> ....... I will just add that I *think* the 6.5 EXP/PP-2 TELNET
> includes support for Advanced TELNET..  For QCTerm
> users, this is another good reason to go to host-based...

James said "not so fast":

> FYI: The "Advanced TELNET" functionality has been pulled
> from all recent Telnet patches due to a corner case of data
> loss.  This functionality will be returned to Telnet when the
> data loss is addressed.

Shoot....  well, clearly don't want 3000 users to lose any of their
data;  better later and right than sooner and wrong, I guess....

May we depend on you to give this list notice when a TELNET
fix patch that solves this "corner case" bug is available ??..   :-)

thanks for update,

Ken Sletten

ATOM RSS1 RSS2