Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:30:19 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
X-no-Archive:yes
Glenn is correct. Any Celeron with a speed of greater than 300 (and even some
of the 300s) has an-chip L2 cache of 128KB. This cache is smaller than the
PIII's cache, and the PII's cache, but it is faster than the latter, as the PII
cache was off-chip.
In fact, the newer Celerons are excellent CPUs, excellent value for the money.
Kind regards,
Denys. . .
Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP
(800) 323-8863 (281) 288-7438 Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com www.hicomp.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Cole [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, 05 August, 1999 2:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Off Topic - Seti
Wirt writes:
> The time to calculate one work unit is about 11-12 hours, only
> slightly slower than Gavin is reporting, even though the Celeron processor
> is a significantly crippled version of the Pentium II.
Significantly cripped?? That's not true since Intel added the L2 cache
to later Celerons, is it?
--Glenn
.......................................................................
Item Subject: cc:Mail Text
|
|
|