HP3000-L Archives

August 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denys Beauchemin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 14:30:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
Glenn is correct.  Any Celeron with a speed of greater than 300 (and even some
of the 300s) has an-chip L2 cache of 128KB.  This cache is smaller than the
PIII's cache, and the PII's cache, but it is faster than the latter, as the PII
cache was off-chip.

In fact, the newer Celerons are excellent CPUs, excellent value for the money.

Kind regards,

Denys. . .

Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP
(800) 323-8863  (281) 288-7438         Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com                             www.hicomp.com


-----Original Message-----
From:   Glenn Cole [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Thursday, 05 August, 1999 2:01 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: Off Topic - Seti

Wirt writes:

> The time to calculate one work unit is about 11-12 hours, only
> slightly slower than Gavin is reporting, even though the Celeron processor
> is a significantly crippled version of the Pentium II.

Significantly cripped??  That's not true since Intel added the L2 cache
to later Celerons, is it?

--Glenn

.......................................................................

Item Subject: cc:Mail Text

ATOM RSS1 RSS2