HP3000-L Archives

March 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Greg ~ AND" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg ~ AND
Date:
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 20:42:04 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
If someone with some experience DTC TelnetAccess could reply to me via
email, I am trying to make some sense of this from just the LaserROM. I
gather that one can have one (and only one?) Telnet Access Card (TAC) in
a DTC48. Assuming the desire to telnet to the 3K across a WAN, could the
DTC be local to the users on the other side of the WAN, and how well
does that work? Or, if the DTC should be more local to the host, and the
TCP/IP traffic crosses the WAN (which is our area of difficulty, poor
performance across a congested and perhaps problematic WAN), would there
be much advantage to using the DTC48? Assuming dedicated users, how many
user can one DTC48 reasonably support? Does one telnet to the IP address
of the card or the 3K? How might this compare using with inetd on a
996/200?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2