Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 May 1998 16:50:33 +0000 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm confused, I don't understand why NOT having a default gateway is a
problem. The other side of the coin is having hardcoded gateways which
should still work and enhance security. Or am I going down a merry path?
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Genute, Thomas wrote:
> There are problems with Telnet and problems with NS with PP4. With NS the
> default gateway stopped working. If, as defined in NMMGR, the default
> gateway has any reachable network defined other than "@", it is not
> recognized as a default gateway. NETTOOL has some enhancements such as
> GATELIST, GATEUP and GATEDOWN. The plus is that when a router went down, it
> is indicated with the GATELIST command. The minus is that when the router
> came back up, the 3k didn't recognize we manually brought it up with GATEUP.
> The Telnet problems are more insidious. ...
|
|
|