HP3000-L Archives

May 1998, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 May 1998 16:50:33 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines)
I'm confused, I don't understand why NOT having a default gateway is a
problem.  The other side of the coin is having hardcoded gateways which
should still work and enhance security.  Or am I going down a merry path?

On Wed, 13 May 1998, Genute, Thomas wrote:

> There are problems with Telnet and problems with NS with PP4.  With NS the
> default gateway stopped working.  If, as defined in NMMGR, the default
> gateway has any reachable network defined other than "@", it is not
> recognized as a default gateway.  NETTOOL has some enhancements such as
> GATELIST, GATEUP and GATEDOWN.  The plus is that when a router went down, it
> is indicated with the GATELIST command.  The minus is that when the router
> came back up, the 3k didn't recognize we manually brought it up with GATEUP.
> The Telnet problems are more insidious. ...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2