According to the HP Y2K white paper, 917 and 967 are Tested and 2000-Ready,
that means that H/W "will operate in a well-defined, predictable manner
when using dates beyond the year 2000, and will not result in errors
related to the year 2000 rollover."
By the way, 925, 935, and 949 are not tested.

2nd question should be answered by HP,

3rd question is answered by the above: no reasons not to do it.

Best regards, Andreas Schmidt, CSC, Germany






Juan Pineiro <[log in to unmask]> on 08/04/98 06:03:02 PM

Please respond to Juan Pineiro <[log in to unmask]>

To:   [log in to unmask]
cc:    (bcc: Andreas Schmidt/HI/CSC)
Subject:  HP917 and HP967 and Y2K




Anybody know off hand ....
1.Are these two systems Y2k compliant hardware?
2.Any plans for HP not to support these boxes in the near distant future?
3. Any reason why we would not be able to set the clock forward past 2000
and test?

TIA