Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 May 2001 13:20:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, I like this option better then the MPEX option mainly because I create
a variety of utility job streams that I place on a number of HPe3000
computer I support and I don't want to be dependent on a purchasable utility
that not all of them have.
Thanx,
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Mark Bixby
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Console prompting from a batch job
Donna Garverick wrote:
>
> "Jonathan M. Backus" wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know of a little utility program that can be placed
in a batch
> > job that would then prompt the console for a reply and it would then set
a
> > variable based on the reply before moving on? I'm not looking for
variable
> > replacement at stream time but rather variable creation during execution
of
> > a job.
>
> almost..sorta...kinda...maybe :-) a patch is available that modifies the
ci 'input'
> function so that it can be directed to a specific device (like the
console). you'd be
> 'rolling your own' but i think it would work. - d 'anyone know the
patch id?'
Patch MPELXL5A for 6.5 enhances :INPUT and input() to be able to interact
with
the console.
--
[log in to unmask]
Remainder of .sig suppressed to conserve scarce California electrons...
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|