Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jan 1995 10:58:10 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
[This note has been sent to the following InterNet address(es):
[log in to unmask]
it has also been sent to the following JP Morgan address(es) :
To : SSWPROD.OAS@TRSSW
]
Larry Boyd wrote :
[..Big Snip ..]
>Steve, can you check if it's been requested? If not, why not take the
>information from Ken's post (and possibly a followup phone call) and get
>it on the official list. If it helps to have more than one customer to
>request it, put my name on the list.
>
>Anyone else want on the list? Clint? John?
Count me in....but I would like to see some (if not all) of the ideas below
also.
Sorry, didn't get the name :
> Sorted :SHOWJOB would be nice, but I think I might place a higher priority
> on finer selection criteria - possibly a ;SELEQ=[] construct similar to what
> is currently available in :LISTSPF. Suggested selection options...
> JOBNUM=[J|S]nnn
> JOBNAME=[jsname@,][log in to unmask]@
> STREAMEDBY=[[J|S]nnn|[jsname@,][log in to unmask]@]
> ORIGIN=[DTC|VT|TELNET]
> JOBINTRO[<|<=|=|>=|>]mm/dd/yy[hh:mm:ss]
> JOBCPUSECS[<|<=|=|>=|>]sss
Yes, I like the SELEQ=[] idea.
I am working with a couple of Emeralds and have put together a command file
that searches the SHOWJOB
output for job numbers, session numbers, Ldevs or a string. I never do a
SHOWJOB as it takes too long to execute !
John Dunlop ([log in to unmask])
|
|
|