HP3000-L Archives

April 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brent Flowers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brent Flowers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Apr 1998 15:05:21 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>Stan notes:
>
>Gary asks:
>> We unpacked the new 918 box yesterday and installed
>> 384 megs of extra memory. During our work I noticed
>> the CPU information indicated that we had a 48MHZ
>> processor, the same speed as the 928RX we purchased
>> two years ago. Has HP started 'overclocking' 918s?
>
>No.  HP's published information states that the 918 is
>slower than the 928.
>

The HP3000/900 Configuration Guide (February, 1998, page 1-2) notes:
"The [slower?] clock speeds of the 918LX/RX, 939KS/020, and 996/80 are
effected with software."

Jazz says, "The MPE 918DX ... is a 918/LX with ... 64 MB memory ..."

Does this mean software is being used to intentionally slow the clocks
down?  I find myself imagining a piece of code which kicks in every so
often to count from 1 to 1000, wasting enough clock cycles to slow it
from 48MHz to 34MHz.
--
Brent (just curious) Flowers

ATOM RSS1 RSS2