Wirt Atmar wrote:

> Outside of the HP3000 world, telnet has become the universally standard
> mechanism for terminal-like devices to communicate with their hosts -- and as
> more and more diverse clients are connected to the HP3000, telnet was bound
> to rise in popularity very quickly, to the point that even though the ratio
> was 10,000:1 three years ago, it seemed reasonable at the time to presume
> that NS/VT's days were numbered.

If QCTerm and CSY want to keep with the times, you should look beyond
classic telnet into ssh, unless VPN connectivity surpasses it.

Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>