HP3000-L Archives

October 2004, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:01:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I hate to repeat myself, but Sheriff Joe in AZ has the answer.

John Lee



At 01:29 PM 10/13/04 -0400, Brice Yokem wrote:
>I have a very simple math formula to support the death penalty.  Stats are
>like 10% of the criminals commit 80% of the crime, so you kill that 10% and
>suddenly there is hardly any crime left, and because they are dead, there
>is no chance to get back out on the street and commit more crimes.  Harsh
>punishment is actually a detriment, the problem with the death penalty is
>not that we have it, but that it is so rarely used and takes so long to be
>enforced that it isn't really seen as a detriment.  Personally if my
>choices are life in prison and the death penalty, I'd take the death
>penalty, who wants to sit in prison your whole life, which is just a slow
>death penalty.
>
>----------------------
>
>Shawn -
>
>I think our Criminal Justice system is broken.  It has devolved from
>a system for disciplining criminals, to one that employs people who
>work in the legal system.  That has to change for it to work properly.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2