Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Stigers, Greg ~ AND |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:31:42 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I know that our IT admins install RUMBA for HP only with difficulty, and
that the last version I saw was part of their 32-bit product, but was
itself 16 bit. A subsequent edition of RUMBA does not seem to include an
emulator, and I never heard back from our IT admins about this. All of
this may say more about our IT admins than about RUMBA, but I know of no
one here who claims to like the product, and have encouraged
investigation into a competitive upgrade to a Reflection suite. Our
project has Reflection for HP, and I would probably use QCTerm before
using RUMBA. After looking into some of the available choices, I was
asked to meet with our Wall Data reps to review what I thought were the
deficiencies of RUMBA, among them the lack of support for file codes on
the 3000. They had no solution for this or for other problems; it was
only later that I learned that command line ftp with buildparms could
have met this need.
insert std disclaimers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtieken [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 11:15 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] Rumba for the HP3000
>
> Does anyone have any experiance using Rumba for the connection to the
> HP3000
> instead of Reflection. We would be using this in a network
> environment using Windows NT or Win 95/98. This product has been
> recommended as an alternative to Reflection. Any comments would be
> appreciated both on this list or privately.
>
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|