HP3000-L Archives

May 2000, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 31 May 2000 09:47:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I'm enough of an old-timer to *prefer* the "brain-dead" compiler and lint
combination over ANSI compilers.  It's easier to shoot yourself in the foot that
way, but that's part of the fun of programming in C.  Give me a K&R compiler and
a copy of lint any day.

Of course, gcc (and other compilers) provide switches to turn off a lot of the
warning messages.  But I prefer lint because it only gives me what I ask for; I
don't have to ask it NOT to do things.



Lint was originally an AT&T supplied tool that scanned C source code looking
for possible problems.  This was/is a vital tool, because original (and many
other) C compilers were brain-dead, and did a lousy jon of checking for such
problems.  (gcc is much better, having many lint-like checks built in.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2