HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hansang Bae <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:42:54 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
"Al" <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>We had no disconnection problems before when we had Hubs instead of these
>switches. We are only getting them in the last couple of weeks. We are
>monitoring the switch port that goes into a Hub which itself connects into
>the thinnet via a BNC. We get something like 2000 collisions each hour on
>this port.  I am thinking getting rid of the thinnet and putting our old
>928s directly on the switches. But I no experience of these 3Ks boxes on a
>switched network.


2000 collisions in an of itself is completely meaningless.  My guess is
that you had more in the past, but you just weren't looking.  Just make
sure that your switch port isn't been swamped and that flow control is
turned of as appropriate.  Since this port is being connected to a hub,
locking the switch port to half duplex would be a must.  I'm not
familiar with the 928's or the 3K boxes you're alluding to so I can't
speak about ti.


*********** Remove the REMOVE if emailing me directly **************
Due to the volume of email that I receive, I may not not be able to
reply to emails sent to my account.  Please post a followup instead.
********************************************************************
Hansang Bae        Director of Network Operations, Eastern Region
[log in to unmask]  Reg. Office: (718) 352-9021
Specializing in Network Design/Troubleshooting and Protocol Analysis
********************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2