1.8Million
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Paul Scott <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I can say without further research that pig smells much better being
> cooked then in does in a barn. I wonder if I can get part of that
> research funding... even just the amount after the decimal point would
> be sufficient.
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Ray Shahan
> Sent: 2009-03-05 11:22
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Pork in gov't spending now really stinks!
>
> Ok, this is almost too funny if it weren't true. Yup, Pork spending a
> Congress has risen (umm, fallen) to a new level of stench:
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> ***************************************************
>
>
>
> The legislation in question is a $410 billion omnibus bill that would
> keep the federal government running through the rest of the fiscal year,
> which ends in September 2009.
>
> According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group that monitors
> government spending, the bill includes:
>
> * Nearly $1.8 million for pig odor research in Iowa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|