HP3000-L Archives

November 1995, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
jeff brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
jeff brown <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Nov 1995 17:06:07 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
perry@sparc (Brian_Perry) wrote:
>We recently upgraded a 967 to release 5.0, and we now have *very*
>poor performance problems.  Speedware applications *seem* to be
>affected more than other applications, but it's too fuzzy yet to be sure.
>
>HP seems to be saying, among other things, "upgrade your CPU and/or memory"
>Can this really be true....are many other upgraders having similar problems?
>
>Brian Perry
>[log in to unmask]
>
>Nova Scotia, Canada
 
I'm at the same crossroads.  I just upgraded my memory with another 64 megs to
make
way for 5.0.  It seems the HP3000 is being positioned to combine the 9000 and
3000
worlds.  Not sure.
 
 
 
 
       The contents of this message express only the sender's opinion.
       This message does not necessarily reflect the policy or views of
       my employer, Merck & Co., Inc.  All responsibility for the statements
       made in this Usenet posting resides solely and completely with the
       sender.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2