HP3000-L Archives

May 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tony Furnivall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tony Furnivall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 May 1999 08:41:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
At 11:41 AM 5/12/99 +0100, John wrote:
>I visited the page but noticed the phrase (in Red) :
>
>"You must have either a "Value" or "Site Software & Training" membership
>package
>in order to participate in the survey."
>
>It seems a shame that the ballot only includes Interex members.
>Shouldn't it be opened up to the entire HP3000 user community whether
>members of Interex or not?

Oh, John, Really!

This is a very imperfect analogy, but please bear with it.
Let's assume that you are a stockholder in a company that pays an annual
dividend to its stockholders. Let's assume also, that the company is in the
business of trying to, make life better for a whole load of people, some of
whome are stockholders, and most of whom are not. Somehow this company
makes enough money to distribute the dividend I talked about earlier.

How would you feel if all of a sudden people began to say that the dividend
should now be offered to everyone regardless. Doesn't that pretty well
destroy the value of your investment?

Interex develops mechanisms to help improve the lot of the entire HP
community (especially the HP3000 community, but that is largely due to the
historical nature of the Interex/HP relationship). Along the way it offers
special benefits to membership. AMong these is the right to vote on the
System Improvement Ballot. This right is reserved only to members. Anyone
can participate in SIG discussions and SIG surveys and many of the other
opportunities for discourse. But the right to vote is reserved exclusively
tio Interex members.

If someone values that right, the way to acquire it is simple. People who
choose NOT to acquire that right have made a (presumptively) valid judgment
on the value of such a right. What you are proposing is tantamount to
having your neighbours cake and eating it too! Such behavior leads to tooth
decay - and worse (;-)

I have been a vocal defender of the concept that survey participation
should be as wide open as possible, to get the best possible debate; but
that voting should be reserved to those who choose to earn the right, by
becoming members.

Thanks for listening as I got that off my chest!

TOny

ATOM RSS1 RSS2