HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Santucci <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Santucci <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:47:31 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Randall Davis writes:

> absolutely, yes.  We had a horrible time over the last several months
> controlling both the socket table and the inbound buffer tables. Several
> patches were identified (some new as a result of our issues) and loaded
on our
> system.  We seem to be running better now.  These issues have been
(mostly) due
> to the changes HP made in 6.0 in relation to NS. ...

Can you identify these patches for us? Do you know if they made it into
the 6.0 Express 1 release? I'm loathe to upgrade to 6.0 without assurance
of network (NS-VT) connectivity, since that's how 95% of our users
connect.

> ... They made the network services
> more Berkeley Sockets compliant.  As a result, applications that used to
work
> fine, now don't close sockets properly.  When the socket table fills,
you lose
> connectivity.

i.e. more 'open' = less available. What's wrong with this picture?

Patrick
--
Patrick Santucci
Technical Services Analyst
Seabury & Smith, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2