Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jan 1996 16:27:36 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Mohan, Jeff...
(I'm coming in late on this, sorry)
Has anyone mentioned Workgroups yet?
I'd suggest that we don't need yet another wildcard/membership/etc set
of rules, in addition to the Workgroup Manager's.
How about:
1) promoting Workgroups to queues:
1.1) implies ability to specify a LIMIT on the number of jobs/sessions
currently active for a given Workgroup.
1.2) may want to add a workgroup option like "can only be specified
by user request at job/session STREAM/logon time",
and/or "cannot be manually requested" (so you can have a workgroup
that isn't associated with QUEUING, but only processor usage
control)
2) or, if we get new classes/queues anyway, there probably should be
a default workgroup specification for each class/queue. Indeed, you
might want to have a forced workgroup as well as a default workgroup.
In short, I'd suggest being inspired by the Workgroup command names, semantics,
philosophy, etc., whereever possible.
--
Stan Sieler [log in to unmask]
http://www.allegro.com/sieler.html
|
|
|