Stan,

The person actually apologized for voting yes.  Here are his comments to me
(name withheld):


I voted 'yes' but know if my vote was included in the numbers because of the
lateness of my sending the card back.  I didn't receive the info until 3
days before it was due back so I quickly glanced at the info, marked the
card, and sent it back.  I didn't read the info received because of the time
frame.  I also suspect that a number of people, those that voted "yes", did
not read it and/or decipher the info to really understand what they were
agreeing/disagreeing to.  Sometimes that lawyer mumbo-jumbo lingo gets your
head spinning and you lose the original point of the amendment.


Judy

-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 12:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Results of Interex "Special Election"


Judy writes:

> I have received 26 responses representing 30 votes to date.  The results
so
> far are 1 YES and 29 NO.

Ahh...one person who either couldn't read, or couldn't work out the
implications of what they read.  The only other conspiracy-free
alternative is to assume that they don't care about the electoral
process ... because they voted for a known faulty bylaw, hoping
that it would be corrected later.  If a law is faulty, it's your duty to
vote against it ... and perhaps help to get a non-faulty one on the ballot.
(The conspiracy theory is that the "yes" voter was fully aware of the
flaw, and hoped to benefit from it somehow.   :) for the humor impaired)

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                         http://www.allegro.com/sieler/