HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:31:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
AT&T is Frame provider...  I have a firm belief that they just lie to
me, no matter what the problem...  CIR and burst are =.  Another,
interesting point: Not all clients get dropped at the same time???  If
there were an interuption in WAN, would that not disconnect all clients?

Thanks,
Jim

In article <[log in to unmask]>,
  Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Larry Barnes wrote:
> >
> > I would be involving your circuit provider at this point.  They
> > maybe having issues with certain circuits.
>
> Agreed.  Especially if your Committed Information Rate is a whole lot
> more than your Burst rate.  You might also look for BECNs on the
Cisco.
> If you're consistently exceeding the CIR you're going to loose a WHOLE
> LOT of packets if the frame cloud is congested overall.
>
> You don't have one of those old, despicable Sprint CIR 0 circuits, do
> you?
>
> Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2