HP3000-L Archives

September 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Sep 1999 17:55:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
James writes:

> Relative CPU performance tables show a 948 and 918 and 917 thru 947 as having
> approximately the same CPU performance.  The 9x7 and 918 could (do) have a
> floating point processor that can bring their performance to a little above
> a 948.
>
> But Memory capacity is generally greater on the later machines and can
> have dramatic effects on overall system performance.

Ironically, the max mem on a 9x7 is 768 MB (I've seen it done, and
I've recently run 576 MB on a 917), but the max mem on a 9x8 is only 512 MB.

--
Stan Sieler                                          [log in to unmask]
                                         http://www.allegro.com/sieler/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2