HP3000-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Dunlop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 1996 11:02:11 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
[This note has been sent to the following InterNet address(es):
[log in to unmask]]
 
 
On 1/3/96, Denysb @ AOL.COM (Denys Beauchemin)  wrote :
 
>2- Better resiliency.  If you have multiple UVS (User Volume Sets) you are
>less hurt when you throw a disc (so to speak).  If the disc is part of SVS
>(MPE_XL_SYSTEM_VOLUME_SET) you may be faced with an INSTALL but only for that
>(relatively) small volume set.  If the disc is part of a UVS, then only that
>volume set goes down, the rest stays up.  You can then deal with that UVS
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>while the other UVS' remain unaffected.
 
I beg to differ, I have experienced situations  where a Private Volume drive
has failed and brought down the whole system. Also, the whole system has been
brought down by merely attempting to purge a corrupt file on a PVS.
 
Just to clarify.
 
Cheers,
John Dunlop ([log in to unmask])

ATOM RSS1 RSS2