 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 5 Jun 1997 08:49:32 PST428_- Greg Chaplin wrote: >I've been racking my brains trying to figure out a way of putting >certain groups in our development account off-limits. I'm trying to >set up source control procedures, such that the original files are >kept in the "secure" groups. [snip] >Anyone got any hints or ideas? I don't think we need to buy a >full-blown source control package. [...]46_5Jun199708:49: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jun 1997 21:39:38 -0400 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------
> From: John Korb <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: SAMBA question
> Date: Thursday, June 05, 1997 1:29 PM
>
> A while back there was a post which implied that Windows 95 clients
would
> not be able to "see" SAMBA/iX if the Windows 95 client uses a hosts
file.
Absolutely not ... actually a HOSTS file is beneficial if DNS is not used.
LMHOSTS can also be used as well. This sounds like on of my earlier
posts on the 5.0 problem - and if there was a misunderstanding - please
accept my apologies...
>
> Also, a question came up as to whether the Windows 95 client would be
> able to see the SAMBA/iX server if they were on different segments of a
> routered network. Anyone know the answer?
They can be on different routed segments, however, the subnet for the 3000
needs to be placed into the smb.conf file after the IP address. DNS
and/or your routers should also help in this regard.
Best regards,
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Joe Geiser - CSI Business Solutions, LLC
140 Bristol-Oxford Valley Road, Suite 102
Langhorne, PA 19047-3083, USA
Phone: (215) 945-8100 Fax: (215) 943-8408
[log in to unmask] http://www.csillc.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
|
|
|
