HP3000-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"(Rick Clark)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:02:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 96-03-01 00:29:39 EST, [log in to unmask] (KLRenk) writes:
 
>I have heard and seen articles about just making LDEV 1 the only volume in
>the system volume set and creating a different volume set for the rest.
>What is this groups feelings on segregating LDEV 1.   Is it worth it?
 
Yes,   I feel it is worth it.  We have three volume sets (system, production,
and a third that is used by our sister company).  If a drive in a non-system
volume goes down,  the other two are not affected and work goes on as usual
for everyone (but me:-)
 
>
>I am in the process of upgrading our hp3000 to 939ks and deciding whether
>or not to do it.   LDEV 1 is a 2db drive.  Any thoughts would be
>appreciated....
 
Rick Clark
Systems Manager
Nook Industries

ATOM RSS1 RSS2