HP3000-L Archives

March 2006, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James B. Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 01:35:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:31:26 -0800, donna garverick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> eloquence can be the database of destination or a stepping stone. 
> that is, use it to get the migration done with the plan to move to
> ______ once stable on the new platform.  (this of course takes some
> serious commitment from all involved to complete this phase.) 
> 
> each shop is different.  each migration is different.  but when so
> much is depending on the programming staff to complete the migration --
> maybe eloquence should be considered for non-technical reasons. 

My observations have been that decisions like this are rarely made on 
technical merits.  At best, technical issues are sometimes used as a 
tie-breaker between two equally (un)desirable paths. At worst they 
are shaped to support what is, at root, an arbitrary decision 
informed by self-interest rather than communal good.  Usually 
however, the determinant factor is cost and the essential task lies 
in fixing that cost as accurately as possible. In such cases 
technical issues devolve into two simple questions: can the chosen 
technology deliver the minimum functionality and support the 
transaction volume required?

The greatest asset that any enterprise possesses is its corporate 
memory and that reposes in its records.  The form those records take 
and their retrieval systems necessary to support business decisions 
frequently are the most important factors in the stability and 
prospects of corporations.  Thus moving an entire corporation from 
one records storage format to another is a major undertaking, one 
that is fraught with peril and usually accompanied by considerable 
expense, both direct and consequential.

So, the idea of moving to an interim form of storage in anticipation 
of later selecting a final choice strikes me as inherently reckless 
and needlessly expensive.  In some cases that course might be forced 
by circumstance but I would have grave reservations regarding any 
plan that took this as a central feature.

We evaluated Eloquence for some time and found it very appealing.  
But, then we were quite content to stay on the HP3000 and Image for 
the rest of eternity as well.  Eloquence will appeal to those HP3000 
users in situations where a great deal of their existing code base 
can be preserved by maintaining a familiar data structure and that 
code base represents a significant investment.  Eloquence offers the 
prospect of preserving the vast majority of their investment in code 
and systems process knowledge to the benefit of the corporation, its 
employees, and those who must bear the actual costs of conversion and 
any injuries contingent on business interruption or record loss. 

Where the existing code base does not represent decades of 
development amounting to such considerable sums then the relatively 
low cost of more recent DBMS and programming tool software offers an 
opportunity to completely refashion their systems.  These enterprises 
can thereby take advantage of nearly universal internet access and 
the ubiquitous presence of personal computers running more-or-less 
standards compliant web browser software.  

Restructuring corporate information systems to take advantage of 
these recently developed environmental factors allows for a good deal 
of the cost associated with record management to be externalized.  
The corporation can have their clients enter their own orders, track 
their fulfilment, make their payments, and often do much of the the 
corporation's work that formally could only be performed within the 
confines of accounting, purchasing, sales, or customer service.

The choice of DBMS and programming language is, for these firms, a 
secondary consideration and, for solutions of reasonably comparable 
costs, as likely to driven by fashion as by function.

Regards,
Jim

-- 

***     e-mail is NOT a secure channel     ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB.<token>@Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3CE               delivery <token> = hal

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2