Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 May 1999 13:58:05 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Item Subject: cc:Mail Text
(Sorry for the previous unintended post. I was trying to "select all" in
cc:Mail, and I wrongly guessed ctl-A. Unfortunately, I fat-fingered ctl-S
instead. Drat.)
Ed Foster's current column on Infoworld is a bit frightening:
I recently told you about the Uniform Computer Information
Transactions Act (UCITA), the new name for UCC Article 2B.
[snip]
UCITA will make the rules clear for shrink-wrap and click-wrap
software licenses, and in essence it will say that what the vendors
want goes. If they don't want to warrant that their products are
fit for any purpose, they don't have to. If they want you to
warrant that you will inform them whenever your telephone number
changes, they can do so. Live with it, or read all that fine print
until you find a vendor who offers better terms, if one even
exists.
I don't think I care about whether something is warranted for a particular
purpose (isn't that the way it is now?), but to require ME to take some
action just because some seemingly-unrelated event occurs strikes me as
unreasonable.
Can anyone provide more insight into this?
The full article is at
< http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayNew.pl?/foster/foster.htm >
--Glenn
|
|
|