HP3000-L Archives

March 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Expensive RDBM Systems (Oracle)
From:
Steve Dirickson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Dirickson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 23:42:35 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
> sentiment.  I
> suppose that if someone has actually published TPC-D results for an
> HP9000-Oracle combination then we could accept those.

Apparently HP never submitted that combination; whether or not they ever
tested it is unknown. The only TPC-D results submitted by HP were for two
versions of Oracle 8 running on NetServer LXr 8000 hardware using the 300GB
configuration.

TPC-H results are published for Informix on N4000, V2500 (both at 300GB)
and, less than a month ago, Superdome Enterprise at the 1000GB level. DB2
UDB on an RS/6000 SP 550 soundly spanked the Informix/Superdome combo on
both raw QphH performance and on Price/QphH.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2