HP3000-L Archives

July 1998, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Here We Go Again...

Stephane Lassire writes,

> Yesterday Duane Percox answered longly to Brian about the
> decision of his
> company to migrate to HP9K. For Duane HP make a lot of efforts for
> supporting the HP3K in his strategic presentations.
> As a MIS in a little company in France I can say that [...]44_3Jul199808:45:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 1 Jul 1998 22:32:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Chen Hai Jing said in his message of 01-July-1998 at 9:03 PM:

> The error is created by a 'PERFORM SOMETHING THRU SOMETHING-EXIT'. An
> 'GOTO' command is inserted within the subprogram and lead to an other
> process. It seems a forced 'GOTO' from within a 'PERFORM' will cause the
> pointer be pushed into a stack. And will some times make the stack
> over-flow.

Ahhh - the dreaded GOTO in a COBOL program... in a PERFORM THRU as well!

Denys - Take that wet noodle we were talking about earlier, ship it to
China, and let Chen Hi have it to whip the person responsible for this ...
this GOTO of all things!

(I jest, of course - although GOTO statements are a no-no if at all possible
in my book).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2