HP3000-L Archives

February 2004, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Goetz Neumann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Goetz Neumann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:03:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
 Denys Beauchemin wrote:

> David brings up a good point about multiple drives in the array.
>
> To my mind, I am uncertain about the benefits of having multiple drives
> declared in the array versus declaring a single big device or at least
> as many as there are controllers.  I definitely see the benefits in
> having multiple volume sets, but perhaps not many more devices beyond
> that, except to get by the MPE limitations on drive sizes.

There are a 2 that I can think of right away:

- more MPE LDEVs means more parallel IOs possible, each
   SCSI_DISK_AND_ARRAY_DM can handle up to 8 'parallel' IOs
   from an MPE driver's standpoint.

- there are limits in the size of certain MPE data structures
   on each LDEV, e.g. the size of the file label table (limited
   to 256k entries).  If you have lots of small files, more LDEVs
   mean less chances to hit that limit.

Goetz

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2