It's true. If not, I'm in deep doo doo....... ;-)
Rick Clark
Senior Systems Analyst
WW&R
Cleveland, Ohio
Joe Geiser wrote:
>
> Mark Undrill writes,
>
> > Err. Shouldn't that be STORE/RESTORE /;.... not STORE/RESTORE
> > @[log in to unmask]@;....
>
> Actually, I believe Mark, that as of 5.0 or 5.5, the use of either / or @[log in to unmask]@
> in a :STORE or :RESTORE operation were equal, and both will catch HFS files.
> This was done because of the confusion early on, when users were still using
> @[log in to unmask]@ and not catching the HFS files. We use @[log in to unmask]@ all the time under 5.5 and
> 6.0, and all of the HFS files are found and stored.
>
> Regards,
> Joe