Ummm...........  Since this is a European article the usual sequence for a date is dd/mm/yyyy  therefore the date of the article is May 10, 2002

Paul


On Fri, 10 May 2002 11:00:08 -0500, Craig M. Lalley wrote:

>This was dated 10/5, what was the outcome or is it still going on?
>
>
>
>Craig M. Lalley
>Systems Performance Specialist
>Lund Performance Solutions
>Phone (630) 717-8534 | Email [log in to unmask]
>Fax     (541) 812-7611 | Web   http://www.lund.com/
>_________________________________________
>NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
>information.  If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you
>may have received this communication in error, please reply to the
>sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received.  In
>addition, you should not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or
>otherwise use the information.  Thank you
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of Jim Mc Coy
>Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:58 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Stan and friends targeted by HP?
>Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>Sounds like maybe a case for Eugene.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *