Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 11 Oct 1996 22:50:10 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi,
Here is another reply of mine to Jerry re. system vars:
On Oct 11, 11:51am, Jerry Fochtman wrote:
> Subject: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: Design for System CI vars (long)
I wrote:
> > >:showvar aa,bb ;format=detail
> >>
> >>VarName Type Scope Owner Access Value
> >>AA INT JOB 1
> >>BB STR[1] SYS MANAGER.SYS R-only 2
Paul C. wrote:
> >How about placing the 'variable length' items on the right side:
> >
> >:setvar DEFAULT_MENU "APPL_MAINTENANCE"
> >
> >:showvar aa,bb,def@ ;format=detail
> >
> >Type Scope Owner Access VarName|Value
> >INT JOB AA|1
> >STR[1] SYS MANAGER.SYS R-only BB|2
> >STR[16] JOB MGR.USRACCT R-only DEFAULT_MENU|APPL_MAINTENANCE
Jerry wrote:
> Would be better if we had an intrinsic API as well so parsing the CI output
> was not an issue, but given effort/etc., the CI-output is better than
> nothing! I tend to agree with Paul's suggesting in terms of placement of
> the variable length components....
>
Agreed. I have thought about a varinfo() function. Or maybe individual
functions like varaccess(), varscope(), varowner(), etc. are more
useful? Anyway, I don't know what the extra cost is to implement these
functions but I will consider them!
thanks,
Jeff
--
|
|
|