HP3000-L Archives

September 2005, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Dunlop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 05:07:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi all,

I have been catching up on my Digests and enjoyed reading the Oil Companies thread.
One thing that struck me, and no-one mentioned, when talking about building new
Oil Refineries etc....my question is Why?

Surely it would be better to plough the money into research into renewable energy
sources rather than build an unneeded and eventually obsolete structure?

Surely the more forward-thinking people realise that fossil fuels will be a thing
of the past once all the existing deposits have been exhausted and that now is
the time to promote cleaner, more enduring energy sources? Unless, of course, we
are talking about a refinery that can convert rape seed into combustible fuel,
for example.

I wasn't aware that the US had a moratorium on drilling new wells on its own
soil. Is this true? Is this so that the rest of the world can have their deposits
exhausted first and the US will still have their own reserves to use afterwards?
or am I being over-cynical?

It's a shame that the big oil companies have such a stranglehold on the US that
any alternatives to dirty, expensive, fossil fuels is quickly quashed.

When will sense return to the decision makers in the US?

I live in hope.

Cheers,

John Dunlop


---- Message sent via Totalise Webmail - http://www.totalise.co.uk/ MAX Broadband 2Mb now just £17.99 a month plus 2 months free!

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2