HP3000-L Archives

September 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:25:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
The only theory that I could come up with is that there simply is no
extended profit in selling a machine/system that works so well and for so
long.  There is far more money to be made on machines/systems that
perpetually require upgrades, maintenance and support.

Somewhat like a car that *could* be manufactured to function far longer than
todays average automobile life.  There's only limited profit in that.  It's
much more profitable to manufacture an automobile that has a limited life
cycle in order to perpetuate future purchases.

Just my too sense :)






_______________________________________________________
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2