HP3000-L Archives

August 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Shahan, Ray" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shahan, Ray
Date:
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:51:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
There is also the point that hp wants to sell you another new box later, and
increasing maintenance costs for your current box is one way to accomplish
that.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Gilligan [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:09 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Maintenance pricing
>
> omp.sys.hp.mpe #80636 (0 + 1 more)
> From: John Pearce <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Thu Aug 23 18:00:09 PDT 2001
> Organization: e3000.org gateway
> Lines: 16
>
> John Pearce writes:
>
> > I've been looking at pricing for both A- and N-series machines in
> > selecting a replacement for our 937.  I'm surprised even shocked that
> > the budgetary estimate for maintenance (hardware and software) in the
> > second and third years is double the cost of the first year.  I
> > understand there's some hardware warranty involved in the first year but
> > to have the costs double???
>
> That's because the first year warranty is next day hardware, no phone
> support.
>
> Your 3 year warranty (possibly same day support...) is the uplift cost for
> the first year to same day from next day, probably adding in phone
> support.  Year two and three are probably close to the sum of the next day
> and uplift costs.
>
> I remember a couple of years ago, getting a year two and three quote from
> HP (not three years paid-in-advance (3Yx)), then comparing it to the three
> year paid-in-advance price.  There was a savings of around 15% when
> ordered as paid-in-advance.
>
> The best thing about three year paid-in-advance service is that you don't
> have to deal with an HP contract administrator for two extra years!
>
> > Has anyone else found this situation in maintenance costs on the new
> > boxes?  If yes, is there an explanation for the increase?
>
> I don't believe I see "an increase"... but I believe they disguised one...
> try comparing a recent quote from HP on a year's maintenance on a 9x8 to
> one from a year ago... quite an increase on comparable year-to-year
> service.
>
> So, the new A class server looks good, compared to the "new" price on the
> 9x8 service.
>
> Face it, the costs for phone support and sending software updates haven't
> dropped (unless you want to count the pay cut some HP employees are
> taking).
>
> :-(
>
> The costs of sending a CE out on a hardware call, plus the hardware
> replacement parts probably haven't dropped much either... so I would not
> expect lower maintenance costs for current hardware over last year's
> hardware, despite the twist HP marketing tries to put on it.
>
> Rick
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2