HP3000-L Archives

November 1999, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"L. A. Barnes" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
L. A. Barnes
Date:
Mon, 8 Nov 1999 15:49:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
I agree.  I'll provide the soap!

ALBERT KARMAN wrote:

> Dear Fellow Listers,
>
> Allright.  We've officially blown this judicial decision way, way, way out
> of proportion.  We're in the pre-game portion of the Superbowl, for goodness
> sake!
>
> Perhaps it's time for a subsidiary list---perhaps HP3K Soapbox.....
>
> Al Karman
> IT Consultant
> Administrative Management Group
> [log in to unmask]
> 847.870.9288
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeanne Pitts [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 3:53 PM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: U.S. Judge Finds Microsoft Holds Monopoly Power
> >
> > Seems to me the judges ruling was right on.  Everything he said about
> > Microsoft is true.  Any bias he has doesn't change the fact that his
> > ruling
> > is correct.
> >
> > Besides, I'm sure he just doesn't want to be assimilated.  I don't want to
> > be assimilated either.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Geiser [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > The fact is, that the judge did show an anti-Microsoft bias, and for that
> > reason alone, he should have recused himself.
> >
> > J...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2