HP3000-L Archives

August 2003, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
fred White <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 09:10:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 08:15 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:

> On 20 Aug 2003 at 13:17, Wayne Brown wrote:
>
>> The article is titled "Bank in HP merger fined
>>> $750,000". It can be found at:
>
> Is it just me but does anyone else see the incongruity of fining a
> bank $750,000 when it gained $2,000,000 by the offence?  More to
> the point, why should the shareholders and customers of a bank
> have to pay the fines for the misdeeds of employees?  Shouldn't the
> individuals have to pay?  So long as fines are levied against
> artificial persons and paid for from the profits of misdeeds where is
> the incentive to reform behaviour?

Email GWB about this matter. He'll "bring them to justice". :-))

FW

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2