Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Nov 1997 22:14:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Phil Anthony <[log in to unmask]>
>I would think that the high-water mark would stay the same, but the
>delete chain would be really, really long. You can repack or reload the
>data set to lower the high-water mark.
Exactly - as (I believe) Ken Paul stated earlier - the HWM dosen't move and
the delete chain would be rather long. After PUTS and DELETES - as well as
CIUPDATES (which, in essence do a DELETE/PUT), a detail repack would be in
order every now and then. For databases I use, even though they are
crash-n-burn for the most part, I have an Adager job which does this for
details I'm working with - the frequency depends on how many times I have to
test with a dataset.
Best,
Joe
Joe Geiser - CSI Business Solutions, LLC
** Your Client-Server and Internetworking Specialists
140 Bristol-Oxford Valley Road, Suite 102
Langhorne, PA 19047-3083, USA
Phone: +1 215.945.8100 Fax: +1 215.943-8408
[log in to unmask] http://www.csillc.com
|
|
|