HP3000-L Archives

March 2003, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chuck Ryan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:08:29 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
> Several years ago (12+years) I gave a paper on volume sets
> and the benefits of using them.  I mentioned increased system
> resiliency,
> enhanced system performance and easier management.
>
> I have two questions:
> 1- Is the performance boost still valid in 7.5?  I believe
> the checkpointing algorithm has somewhat changed in the last 12 years.
> 2- Are there other benefits for using multiple volume sets
> that I might have missed?
>
>
> Denys
>

While I like the benefits of having multiple volumes, I have always felt the
implementation to be lacking.

The whole concept of needing to create a placeholder account/group on the
system volume set feels like a hack and can lead to needless confusion about
where data is located. Of course, I feel the same way about many of the
enhancements made to MPE 6.5+.

Which is why I still run on 6.0 I guess.

Comments are my own, not my employer's... etc.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic message is legally privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee.  If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or any
attachment is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error,
please notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be
corrected and delete it immediately.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2