Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:27:28 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 12:39:54PM -0400, Johnson, Tracy wrote:
> Dave Oksner says:
> > Wirt says:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:47:04PM -0400, Wirt Atmar wrote:
> > > However the product that has stuck in my craw for years now
> > is this one:
> > >
> > > http://www.binter.com.sg/hp3000.htm
> > >
> > > HP's lawyers are apparently simply asleep at the switch.
> > >
> > > Wirt Atmar
> >
> > No, no. This is the real reason they're ending the HP3000.
> > HP quietly
> > LOST the suit and can't keep making a product with that name! ;-)
> >
> > Dave
>
> How does one quietly lose a suit? The results have to be a matter of record somewhere, even if there is a gag order, there has to be a record of it.
>
> BT
>
That was a joke. I shall endevor to make them funnier in the future.
--
+---David Oksner-----http://www.case.net/---+
|Firestone's Law of Forcasting: |
| Chicken Little only has to be right once.|
[log in to unmask]
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|