HP3000-L Archives

February 2002, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: alt.migration, or does anyone know an honest lawyer?
From:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Demos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:24:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
> Nick asks:
>
> >  > It would seem that
> >  > anyone who bought a 3000 (in California at least) after the IA-64
> >  > announcement a couple years ago might have a substantial case
against
> >  > HP if this suit holds up.
> >  >
> >  Why only California?
>
> Because the suit is being brought under California state law,
specificially
> the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
>
I would think other states have similar statues.

Nick D.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2