Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Sep 1996 18:33:15 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Gary Dietz wrote:
> At any rate, we were paying $1,000 per month for support on the 2680 when I
> took it off support. And that was for the lowest level of response time
> support! Seems like an awful lot of money for a printer that seldom
> hickups, let alone breaks. Of course I'm sure that the high maintenance
> cost was also HP's way of "nudging" us to find a different printing solution
> ;)
Well I'm sure there are a lot of different experiences. I know that this
printer has been nothing but a headache for us. After rebuilding one
2680A, HP replace the complete printer with a remarketed unit. We are
still touch and go with print quality. (Ever try scanning an OCR font
that the customer wiped off with his/her thumb? :( )
This is not limited to just the Press-Telegram, but is a thought
discussed openly and often accoss Knight-Ridder. We are anxious to
see a good quality printer replace the 2680A and its very expansive
maintenance contract (24 X 7). I don't see how we could have ever
survived without this contract.
Regards,
John Joerger Press-Telegram (Long Beach)
[log in to unmask] http://www.ptconnect.com
|
|
|