HP3000-L Archives

February 2002, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:58:07 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Tim writes:

>
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.asp?Symbol=US:HWP&Feed=RTR&Dat

e=20020220&ID=1437419

At this point, I would bet at least two half-eaten donuts that the vote won't
pass. My reasons are nothing more than numbers. So far both the Packard and
Hewlett Foundations have come out against the merger, representing 18.5% of
the outstanding shares. In contrast, only large one institutional investor
has publicly announced its support for the merger, representing 1% of the
shares.

It's my understanding that HP has to obtain more than 60% of the vote for the
merger to win approval. That means that only 40% have to oppose it, with
18.5% already making their opposition well know, a percentage already halfway
to guaranteed non-passage.

If HP's polls are correct and if those numbers could be extended to the
general population of shareholders, presuming a 65% approval rate of the
merger, they're going to fail, obtaining only 53.3% shareholder approval.

If David W. Packard's polls are correct and are similarly extended to the
general population, with a 63% disapproval rate, the merger is going to fail
miserably, obtaining only 29.7% shareholder approval.

In either case, HP has a rather steep numerical mountain to climb.

Wirt Atmar

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2