On Tue, 25 Jul 1995, Steve Cole wrote:
> I personally have no problem with the omission of MPE from the list.  From
> my experience MPE has just supported a lot of business while other
> technologies have been evaluated.  I have seen success with other
> technologies but a lot more failures.
 
Okay, then I'm sure you took the time (not a trivial investment) to
fill in your responses and mail them back.  But unless I missed
something, there wasn't anything said about sharing the results!
 
We all share a common base in technology -- the HP 3000.  It seems
fair to me that someone should give back to those who provide
answers to their questions.  Using an environment that is common
to the list provides a better chance that we will understand what
is communicated.  Of course, there are no guarantees!
 
That said, I hope I have the opportunity to pay each of you back
two fold for the information you have provided me!
 
Regards,
 
--- John Joerger  ([log in to unmask])  ---  Press-Telegram (Long Beach)