Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Hoxsie, Howard |
Date: | Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:19:54 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I for one am among a goodly number of citizens of the US who consider
several recent holders of that good high office to have been "unnatural"
born citizens.
Praying I haven't started a sub-thread I'll regret,
Howard
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Wirt Atmar
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] WOT : US Presidential Election
Christian asks:
> I've been told that, to be able to run for President of the USA, one
has to
> be at least 35 and have been born on US soil. What about a kid whose
both
> parents are American, but who happens to be born outside the USA ?
Would
> he/she be allowed to run anyway when he/she is 35 ?
From Wikipedia:
"There is currently debate concerning the definition of "natural born
citizen." The main focus of this debate is whether or not children born
to Americans
overseas be considered eligible for the Presidency. Several main
candidates
have sought the office who were born outside the United States (e.g.,
George
Romney was born in Mexico to U.S. parents, Barry Goldwater was born in
Arizona
while it was still a U.S. territory, and John McCain was born in the
Panama
Canal Zone to U.S. parents). Barry Goldwater's case among these three is
unique in
that although he was born outside the United States, Arizona was later
admitted as a state. None of these candidates was elected, so the issue
was never
fully addressed."
--http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States
Wirt Atmar
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|