HP3000-L Archives

October 1996, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Comparing FTP and WRQ transfers
From:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 16:13:16 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
On Oct 29,  3:00pm, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Subject: Comparing FTP and WRQ transfers
> In transferring ASCII files from the 3000 to a PC, we notice two
> differences between using FTP and downloading with Reflection: speed (!),
> and the resulting byte count.
snip...

I don't know if this is at all related...but when I transfer bytestream
files from my hp-ux worrkstation to jazz (on MPE/iX 5.0) I get byte
counts on jazz that are greater than on my workstation.  Mike Yawn told
me about the ftp "tenex" command, which I used in place of "binary" and
now the byte counts all match!

Jeff Vance, CSY

--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2